NOV/17/93 16 Ravenscliffe Road Calverley Pudsey LS28 5RZ #10929 · NOV/17/93

Cancellation Notice - 10/06/21

returned clients call as requetsed no answer on phone to await caklll back from cvlient jab

owner call tre letter this one has gone legal structural movement had a survey done waitingfor results said you would call him

Retirement Letter Sent

spoke to the clietn legal looking into the situation advised him of the tree year rule over three years old and my retierment in july this year says will speak to solicutors and establish if work will be completed in the next 6 months jab

spoke to the builder says engineer is been sued by client as steel design ineffective says he wuill ring client and see what progress has been made jab

DONT INVOICE

graham nash

final inspection letter and invoice

Invoice resent - 28/01/20

inv resent

From: Jason Walls
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 4:56:43 PM
To: Stuart; Simon Eccles; info JAB; grahamnash202@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: Re: 16 Ravernscliffe Road, Calverley, Leeds Ls28 5RZ

Good afternoon All,

Further to previous emails, we have the following comments:-

We acknowledge recent comments made by the Engineer (Matthew) in his email to Simon Eccles on the 14th March in which comments were made back on our design check. In this it is stated that we may not have the correct design calculations. Also it states the original design was done from drawings and did not consider the fact that the rear of the property is over 3 floors. Based on the above we suggest to avoid further back and forth emails that the engineer should visit site and confirm for himself the various applied beam loadings, as in our opinion there are possibly a number of omissions which should be clarified, as the design is under the warranty of the engineer / architect. These may or may not affect the beam design but should be confirmed. Some issues requiring confirmation are;

1 - The wall dead load allowed of 1.5kn/m^2. This is noted as been assumed to be 75mm cinder block with plaster both sides. This could apply to the internal wall, but the loading has been adopted for masonry outer leaf in the design of beam 1 (outer). The height also needs to reflect the overall existing rear elevation features. We appreciate that there are a number of large openings but load transfer of upper panels is likely to create a more concentrated load path and not a udl.

2 - The outer leaf load is supported on a plate off the underside of beam 1. The beam in turn is at one end supported on a post. The plate will be in bending with load eccentric to the beam. The beam will be in torsion. Therefore we suggest it is important to apply the correct loads to the plate in the design. It is noted that a min 4 bolt connection is required for the connection of beam 1 to the post. We assume this is to restrain some torsion affect. This connection should be confirmed. If it is not stiff enough to resist torsional effects then there could be some twisting of the beam support, which in turn could magnify the bottom plate deflection due to rotation.

3 - Correct / confirmation of roof load distribution

4 - In our opinion it is prudent to design for deflection under both Dead and Imposed loads. Ignoring the dead load in this instance means there will be potentially more deflection once any propping was removed and the building loads were taken by the beams. Deflection under dead load could result in cracking to upper level finishes and sloping of previously level floors.

Kind Regards
Jason.

07841639575 - Stuart Liddell called asking for James. Ask JB to give him a call back.

Spoke to builder on phone steelwork has moved on site informed him that we have not had the opportunity to inspect the works and that client cancelled our last inspection

We need to inspect the works and see what has occurred builder to get contractor to ring office to arrange inspection NO FINAL CERT TO BE ISSUED

IN Acceptance received - 30/11/18

THIS IS TO BE CANCELLED - JB

not paid

owners number 07841639575

john norfolk was the inspector

The project was marked as 'Won'

The project was created